Never miss a great news story!
Get instant notifications from Economic Times
AllowNot now

You can switch off notifications anytime using browser settings.
Stock Analysis, IPO, Mutual Funds, Bonds & More
  • Sudhakar Shanbhag

    Chief Investment Officer, Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Company Limited
    He plays an important role in developing and managing investment structures, processes and practices to enable customers reap benefits. He has been part of Kotak Mahindra Group in varying capacities for over two decades. A chartered accountant and a widely quoted knowledge leader in the investment domain, he comes with over 2 decades of work experience.

Fiscal, monetary options largely exhausted, structural reforms critical to push GDP growth

India’s agriculture model is quite challenged with raising demand-supply imbalance

Sep 19, 2019, 04.00 PM IST
Getty Images
There is an over-reliance on government entities for investment in infrastructure, which results in lower than optimal investment rates for the economy given the fiscal constraints.
The sharp deterioration in economic activity in Q1FY20 and continued slowdown through August suggests the Indian economy faces structural challenges in certain sectors and cyclical slowdown in others linked to a drag by some sectors with structural issues. Structural reforms will be crucial to bring about a change in real GDP growth rates.

India’s agriculture model is quite challenged with raising demand-supply imbalances, leading to stagnant farm prices and incomes, which have necessitated farm income schemes from the government. High consolidated fiscal deficit and strained balance sheets of infrastructure companies have constrained investment rates.

Low growth in household income may be the primary reason for the current slowdown in consumption, which in turn reflects structural problems in the economy linked to limited number of secure jobs being created in the formal sectors and meaningful disruption in parts of the informal economy due to demonetisation, GST implantation and NBFC-related funding challenges as also stagnant farm incomes.

Households may have continued to consume disproportionately to their growth in income in spite of low income growth resulting in rising share of consumption to GDP. However, households perhaps no longer feel confident about consuming given sharp falls in household savings and general negative headline news.

The government has low capacity to provide meaningful fiscal stimulus to the economy, given faltering tax revenues and stagnant GST revenues although they seem to mulling rate cuts for auto sector. The government may have to compromise on fiscal targets to provide stimulus unless it raises large amounts of funds through a well-articulated privatization program. RBI may cut rates by another 50-75 bps, although its efficacy remains to be seen. Interest rates have stayed stubbornly high with the government’s small savings funds program distorting household savings.

Structural reforms will be critical for higher GDP growth as the government may have largely exhausted the fiscal and monetary options unlike previous periods of slowdown in the economy when it had more ammunition to fight the slowdown.

In particular, structural reforms in investments and lower role of government in the economy seem imperative to put India on the path of higher and sustainable GDP growth. Investment-related reforms in manufacturing covering various factors of production like land and labour and faster approval process will be key to low-cost labour-intensive manufacturing and reforms in infrastructure covering areas of ownership of infrastructure assets and pricing services will be important for greater role of private sector and more sustainable investment models.

There is an over-reliance on government entities for investment in infrastructure, which results in lower than optimal investment rates for the economy given the fiscal constraints. Also, the government may want to review its direct role in the economy through PSUs and government agencies, since they are generally inefficient operators versus their private counterparts with several consumer centric businesses making losses, structural constraint for innovation due to high employee costs, and lack of resources due to fiscal constraints.

The government may have to consider large-scale privatisation to fund its infrastructure funding requirements. There may be a need to resolve around ownership below 51 per cent to execute this plan.
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of

Also Read

Of cabbages and kings, onions and GDP

Q3 GDP to be worse: P. Chidambaram

Experts on GDP numbers: 'Worst is not past us'

Likely GDP shock at hand, India braces for impact

Rupee slips 7 paise ahead of GDP data

Add Your Comments
Commenting feature is disabled in your country/region.
Download The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.

Other useful Links

Follow us on

Download et app

Copyright © 2019 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service