The Economic Times
English EditionEnglish Editionहिन्दीગુજરાતી
| 27 September, 2020, 07:21 PM IST | E-Paper

Lenders, Ruias plan to move SC on NCLAT Essar order


The NCLAT has relied on its recent decision in Binani Industries Ltd while passing the order.

Getty Images
As part of the resolution plan, ArcelorMittal will also infuse another Rs 8,000 crore of working capital in Essar Steel.
Mumbai: The latest ruling by the bankruptcy appellate tribunal in the Essar Steel resolution case may not mark the end of the long-drawn legal tussle. Bankers and the Ruias plan to appeal against the decision by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in the Supreme Court, said the people aware of the matter.

The lenders are unhappy with the tribunal ruling that operational creditors should be treated at par with financial creditors at the time of settling claims. The Ruias, the original promoters of Essar Steel, have been trying to regain control of the asset, so appealing against the NCLAT decision that went in favour of ArcelorMittal’s bid is the next logical move.

Bankers told ET they had no option but to move the Supreme Court as the NCLAT order slashes their recoveries to Rs 30,000 crore or 60 per cent of the overall claims against 89 per cent earlier. More importantly, the order undermines the essence of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), which gives financial creditors a superior claim in the recovery process, they said.

“We are filing an appeal next week because this order has ramifications beyond the Essar case,” said one of the bankers. “Financial creditors are treated as secured creditors according to the code but this order, by giving even operational creditors an equal share, has destroyed this distinction. If secured creditors are treated like operational creditors, then we might as well give loans at 16 per cent to 18 per cent per annum without any security.”

On July 4, the appellate tribunal held that the committee of creditors (CoC) had “no role to play in the matter of distribution of amount among the creditors, including the ‘financial creditors’ or the ‘operational creditors.” Essar Steel owes a total Rs 69,192 crore to financial and operational creditors. As per the NCLAT decision, financial creditors will get 60.7 per cent of their dues, while operational creditors with claims over Rs 1 crore will get 59.6 per cent. Creditors with claims of up to Rs 1crore will be paid in full.

“The NCLAT has relied on its recent decision in Binani Industries Ltd while passing the order. The judgement of Binani Industries was also appealed before the Supreme Court and it was upheld. What remains to be seen is whether the SC would take a different view given the unique facts of Essar Steel,” said Ashish K Singh, managing partner of law firm Capstone Legal. “Any detailed decision by the SC on this important matter would set the precedent for many pending cases. Moreover, it would help financial institutions manage their risk at the time of lending as well.”

As part of the resolution plan, ArcelorMittal will also infuse another Rs 8,000 crore of working capital in Essar Steel. The earlier plan approved by the committee of creditors (CoC) had provided for 89 per cent recovery for all financial creditors and around 20.5 per cent for operational creditors with dues of more than Rs 1 crore.

The NCLAT held that the CoC could only look at the viability of a resolution plan and not the distribution of the amount. It also said CoCs were not allowed to form subcommittees to negotiate with resolution applicants.
(What's moving Sensex and Nifty Track latest market news, stock tips and expert advice on ETMarkets. Also, is now on Telegram. For fastest news alerts on financial markets, investment strategies and stocks alerts, subscribe to our Telegram feeds.)

Also Read

2 Comments on this Story

Sanjay Kohli IP445 days ago
The Essar - ArcelorMittal, ruling is welcome, pointing out the inherent "Conflict of Interest" which the Committee of Creditors ( COC ) has, while considering & accepting a "Resolution Plan". Hence, this ruling will provide the much needed formula to satisfy the Operational Creditors'', who may continue their relationship with Resolved entity, which would also be required for smooth functioning of the business, during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ( CIRP ) as well as, once Resolution is achieved. The explanation offered, differentiating Financial Creditors and Operational Creditors, originating from the BLRC Report is also appropriate in it''s own place, for the limited purpose of formation of the Committee of Creditors, which is a substitute to the Board of Directors. As a Resolution Professional ( RP ) is to play the part of the CEO/Managing Director/Chairman (Which one, or all - this also needs to be sorted out in due course).
Njsanghviindore Sanghvi447 days ago
COC has started acting as if they are owners of assets and whatever way they decide on distribution, should be acceptable to all. But secured lenders forget that shortfall in recovery may also be recoverable from personal guarantee of promoters and same is not being disclosed before in resolution plans. Let''s still wait further 2/3 months for Supreme Court decision on this. In the meanwhile if Arcelor withdraws it''s plan looking to delay, whole proceedings will be null and void. And last alternate will be to liquidate.