Never miss a great news story!
Get instant notifications from Economic Times
AllowNot now


You can switch off notifications anytime using browser settings.

Portfolio

Loading...
Select Portfolio and Asset Combination for Display on Market Band
Select Portfolio
Select Asset Class
Show More
Download ET MARKETS APP

Get ET Markets in your own language

DOWNLOAD THE APP NOW

+91

CHOOSE LANGUAGE

ENG

  • ENG - English
  • HIN - हिन्दी
  • GUJ - ગુજરાતી
  • MAR - मराठी
  • BEN - বাংলা
  • KAN - ಕನ್ನಡ
  • ORI - ଓଡିଆ
  • TEL - తెలుగు
  • TAM - தமிழ்
Drag according to your convenience
ET NOW RADIO
ET NOW
TIMES NOW

ED, I-T department, CBI can attach assets mortgaged to banks: Delhi High Court

The court held that probe agencies such as ED, I-T department, CBI and SFIO can attach properties even if these are mortgaged to banks.

, TNN|
Apr 15, 2019, 10.48 AM IST
0Comments
Agencies
Delhi-HC
HC’s verdict came on a batch of appeals by ED against the orders of PMLA appellate tribunal in favour of various banks.
In a ruling that empowers investigating agencies going after assets of high value economic offenders, the Delhi high court has said even properties mortgaged with banks can be attached.

Harmonising the conflict between provisions of money laundering law, PMLA, the Bankruptcy code and related laws, High Court made it clear the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) will prevail when it comes to attachment of properties obtained as “proceeds of crime.” Justice R K Gauba set aside two key conclusions of the PMLA Appellate Tribunal in the process and held that probe agencies such as ED, I-T department, CBI and SFIO can attach properties even if these are mortgaged to banks.

It held that assets purchased prior to commission of crime by an economic offender can also be attached during investigation. Justice Gauba clarified that the PMLA, Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act (RDBA), Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act (SARFAESI Act) and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) must co-exist and be enforced in harmony.

The court said when it came to assets alleged to have been “derived or obtained” as a result of “criminal activity” and consequently being “proceeds of crime,” by virtue of Section 71, the PMLA act will have “overriding effect over other existing laws” in the matter of money-laundering.

It agreed with the argument of ED standing counsel Amit Mahajan that a probe agency is empowered under PMLA to attach not only a “tainted property” which is acquired or obtained directly or indirectly from proceeds of crime, but also any other asset or property of equivalent value owned by the offender, even it was bought before the alleged crime of money laundering.

Justice Gauba pointed out that the other asset, even if it doesn’t bear any taint, is an alternative attachable property on account of its link or nexus with the offence or offender of money laundering.

HC’s verdict came on a batch of appeals by ED against the orders of PMLA appellate tribunal in favour of various banks. ED, had challenged the tribunal's orders on the issue of third party rights over a property attached by the agency. The tribunal had held that third parties — banks in this case — have legitimately created rights such as a charge, lien or other encumbrances and on that basis have a superior claim over such properties.
0Comments

Also Read

Delhi High Court rejects PIL to put stay on PM Modi biopic

Delhi High Court rejects PIL to stay PM Modi biopic

Kishore Chhabria moves Delhi High Court against Dena Bank

Delhi High Court raps ED for blocking transfer of money by Saudi investors

Delhi High Court verdict on Rakesh Asthana plea today

Comments
Add Your Comments
Commenting feature is disabled in your country/region.
Download The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Share Market & More.

Other usefull Links


Follow us on


Download et app


Copyright © 2019 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service